Shoplifting/Retail Fraud: Why Good People Make Bad Choices

Shoplifting, also known as retail fraud, is a crime that surprises many first-time offenders. Often committed by individuals who have never broken the law before, this act may seem completely out of character. Despite its reputation as a petty offense, shoplifting can carry serious consequences, both legally and emotionally. To understand why good people commit retail fraud, we must examine the psychological, social, and situational factors that contribute to this behavior. By applying criminological theories and real-world examples, we can provide insight into how someone might find themselves making this poor choice and how they can grow from the experience.

Criminological Theories Applied to Shoplifting

1. Neutralization Theory (Gresham Sykes and David Matza)

Key Idea: Individuals use mental techniques to justify or rationalize their actions, minimizing guilt or responsibility.

• Application to Shoplifting:
  Many first-time offenders rationalize their actions to align with their self-image as good, law-abiding people. By minimizing harm or denying responsibility, they allow themselves to commit an act that would otherwise conflict with their values.
• Example of Behavior:
  • “It’s such a big store—they won’t even notice.”
  • “I just needed it, and it’s not like I’m hurting anyone.”
  • “Everyone does it at least once; it’s not a big deal.”

By neutralizing the perceived harm or personal responsibility, the individual temporarily suspends their moral compass.

2. Strain Theory (Robert Merton and Robert Agnew)

Key Idea: Stress or strain—whether financial, emotional, or social—can push individuals toward crime when legitimate means of achieving goals are unavailable.

• Application to Shoplifting:
  Strain theory explains why individuals under financial or emotional pressure might resort to theft. They see shoplifting as a way to resolve an immediate problem, even if it conflicts with their long-term values.
• Example of Behavior:
  • A single parent struggling to make ends meet steals diapers or baby formula to provide for their child.
  • A young professional facing mounting credit card debt shoplifts clothing, rationalizing it as a way to maintain appearances at work.

The crime becomes a coping mechanism for stress, even if the individual knows it’s wrong.

3. Opportunity Theory (Cloward and Ohlin)
Key Idea: Crime occurs when opportunity and ability align, creating the conditions for deviance.

• Application to Shoplifting:
  Retail fraud often happens in environments where opportunity is abundant—large stores with lax security, self-checkout systems, or unattended items. These factors create a sense of ease and low risk, leading individuals to act impulsively.
• Example of Behavior:
  • Someone notices an expensive item left unattended in an unmonitored section of a store and pockets it, thinking, “No one will notice.”
  • A teenager at a self-checkout station decides not to scan a pricey item, believing the store won’t catch them. The lack of immediate oversight or perceived deterrence creates a tempting opportunity.

4. Routine Activity Theory (Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson)
Key Idea: Crime occurs when a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian converge.

• Application to Shoplifting:
  Retail fraud often occurs because the conditions make it possible: a motivated person encounters a desirable item with no immediate deterrent. The absence of a “capable guardian” (e.g., store employees or cameras) increases the likelihood of the crime.
• Example of Behavior:
  • A person spots an expensive item in an unsupervised area and decides to take it.
  • During a busy shopping season, an individual slips a small item into their pocket, knowing staff are distracted.

This theory highlights the situational factors that create an environment conducive to theft.

5. Behavioral Economics (Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky)
Key Idea: Cognitive biases influence decision-making, often leading to irrational behavior.

• Application to Shoplifting:
  Shoplifting can stem from present bias, where the immediate gratification of obtaining the item outweighs consideration of the long-term consequences. Overconfidence bias may also play a role, as the individual believes they won’t get caught.
• Example of Behavior:
  • A teenager impulsively steals a gadget they’ve wanted for weeks, focusing only on how good it will feel to have it, rather than the risk of arrest.
  • A person rationalizes stealing an item they can’t afford, telling themselves, “I’ll never get caught because I’m not a thief.”

Alcohol, drugs or stress can exacerbate these biases, further impairing judgment. If a person is not taking their prescribed medication it could alter their judgment.

Additional Factors Contributing to ShopliftingEmotional Triggers

• Stress Relief: For some, the act of shoplifting provides a temporary rush or sense of control during a time of emotional distress.
• Impulse Control: A moment of weakness, driven by anxiety or desire, can lead to an impulsive action.

Social Influences

• Peer Pressure: Especially among younger offenders, peer influence can normalize shoplifting.
• Cultural Norms: In some environments, theft may be viewed as less serious, especially if it’s seen as taking from a “faceless corporation.”

Situational Factors

• Perceived Low Risk: A lack of visible deterrents, like security cameras or staff, can embolden individuals.
• Economic Hardship: Financial strain can lead people to rationalize theft as a necessary means of survival.

The Role of Personal Reflection
Many first-time shoplifting offenders describe the act as feeling like an “out-of-body experience,” something they never imagined themselves doing. The immediate aftermath—being caught, questioned, or charged—can be a sobering moment of reflection. For these individuals, the experience often becomes a catalyst for personal growth and change.

Steps Toward Growth and Accountability

​1. Understanding the “Why”

• Reflect on the circumstances that led to the decision to shoplift.
• Identify emotional, financial, or social stressors that influenced the behavior.
• Recognize any rationalizations or biases that minimized the perceived seriousness of the act.

2. Taking Responsibility
3. Implementing Proactive Measures
4. Restoring Trust
5. Reframing the Experience
​
Final Thoughts
​Shoplifting is often a crime of opportunity, impulsivity, or emotional distress. For first-time offenders, it’s rarely about greed or malicious intent. Instead, it’s a mistake born of temporary weakness, stress, or poor judgment. By understanding the factors that led to this behavior, individuals can take accountability, repair the harm caused, and implement strategies to ensure it never happens again.
​
The goal is to turn this challenging moment into an opportunity for growth—a chance to rebuild trust, strengthen values, and emerge as a stronger, more self-aware individual. With the right approach, what begins as a poor choice can become a powerful catalyst for personal transformation.